It is June,
and we are on the ferryboat from Shiogama to Matsushima, surging across what
has been described as the most beautiful place in Japan, a land of beautiful
places: Matsushima Bay, “Pine-Island” Bay, a shallow inlet of the deep Pacific,
on the long, smooth curve of Sendai Bay.
We have walked to Shiogama from Taga-jo, where the iris beds are once
again riotous with bloom. It is a
gorgeous summer afternoon: clear, cool
and sunny, with a gentle breeze. The
water sparkles, and all the perfect islands gleam.
Happy
vacationers feed shrimp-chips to the seagulls as they always have, and the
seagulls never nip a finger or otherwise fail to delight.
Yet if
you know where to look, you will see the heaps of wreckage in Shiogama harbor,
gathered from all the vanished communities of Tohoku, waiting to be loaded up
and shipped to Kyushu, where sympathetic folk have donated landfill space to
accept it. You will also notice a few
shattered pleasure boats, still littering a small section of shore, and the
seaside promenade you passed on the way to the ship is still undermined and
unsafe for walking, its stone markers tilted at crazy angles, and, mysteriously,
the three tall smokestacks of the power plant are nowhere to be seen.
As the
shore slips away, I wonder: how to express the sameness-yet-radical-difference
of Tohoku, just over a year after the March 11, 2011 earthquake/tsunami? The novelty of the disaster is long over, the
voyeurs have gone home, yet the comfort and normalcy of March 10, 2011 is still irrevocably lost.
Sorrow
hangs in the bright air of Tohoku like the tones of a temple-bell, and like the
repeated tolling of a bell it is renewed around each corner when a stretch of
grass-grown field comes into view, with a shattered house in the center of it,
or when we catch sight of an impossible stack of automobiles, rapidly to become
rusted and dated, their masters lost to the sea.
People
are still struggling to know how best to move forward: should they tear down that damaged house or
rebuild it? Should they put down roots
in a new place or return to a changed old place? Should they keep on with a family business
when the family is nearly all gone, or to start over with an entirely new
venture? When familiar landscapes are
gone, along with the comforting routines that filled them, who can say what is
right?
Tragedy
changes us, and people suffer tragedies everyday, on a small scale: a lost parent here, a sick child there; a
fire destroys a house; a business goes bankrupt. Friends and faith can help us absorb the
shock; we adjust our lives in small increments, each day. But when so many lose so much over such a
short period, who is to comfort them, and how are they to adjust?
It seems
to me that we board a ship each morning, but when we return to the same port at
night, the place has subtly changed, as have we. Since we left port, there have been numerous
small tragedies, but then again, people have fallen in love, people have married,
children have been conceived, children born; ideas have been hatched, projects
completed, boats launched. Things are
not just always dying, they are always growing, too, if perhaps in an
unfamiliar, unexpected form.
And when
they do become familiar – if we let them become
familiar – perhaps our grief will finally fade.
No comments:
Post a Comment